The New York Times The New York Times Science What is affecting
your investments?

 

NYTimes: Home - Site Index - Archive - Help

Welcome, charlygroen - Member Center - Log Out
Site Search:  



ARTICLE TOOLS
Email This Article E-Mail This Article
Printer Friendly Format Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-mailed Articles Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints & Permissions Reprints & Permissions

TIMES NEWS TRACKER

  Topics

Alerts
Children and Youth


Drugs (Pharmaceuticals)


Depression (Mental)


Suicides and Suicide Attempts






Technology
Did you know that you can buy a handheld navigation system that attaches to the dashboard of your car?  

Compare handheld navigation systems.
Read today’s Technology news


Antidepressant Study Seen to Back Expert

By GARDINER HARRIS

Published: August 20, 2004

A top government scientist who concluded last year that most antidepressants are too dangerous for children because of a suicide risk wrote in a memo this week that a new study confirms his findings.

The official, Dr. Andrew D. Mosholder, a senior epidemiologist at the Food and Drug Administration who assesses the safety of medicines, found last year that 22 studies showed that children given antidepressants were nearly twice as likely to become suicidal as those given placebos.

Advertisement

His bosses, however, strongly disagreed with his findings, kept his recommendations secret and initiated a new analysis.

In his memo, dated Monday, Dr. Mosholder said that the results of the new analysis, undertaken in part at Columbia University, matched his own. Though the two studies used different methods and different numbers, they came to similar conclusions, Dr. Mosholder wrote in the internal memo. A copy of the memo was made available to The New York Times.

In the new analysis, Paxil, which is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline, and Effexor, made by Wyeth, have been found to be even more likely to lead children to become suicidal than Dr. Mosholder's original analysis found, his memo says.

The findings add to the debate over whether the government should ban prescribing the pills to children. Dr. Graham Emslie, a researcher whose studies of the drugs in depressed children have been paid for by both drug makers and the National Institutes of Health, said he still thinks the benefits of the medicines outweigh any risks.

"Limiting doctors' choices in treating depressed kids is not a good thing," Dr. Emslie said.

Officials at the Food and Drug Administration have struggled to explain why it has acted so differently from British health authorities, who last year banned the use of all antidepressants but Prozac in children.

The F.D.A. is scheduled to hold an advisory committee hearing on the issue next month. According to people inside and outside the agency, the F.D.A. may next week make public the results of the Columbia study.

The controversy had its start two years ago when Dr. Mosholder was reviewing data submitted by GlaxoSmithKline regarding studies of Paxil in children. Dr. Mosholder noticed that children given the pill suffered more emotional "lability" or vulnerability, than those given placebos. He asked the company for more specifics about what it meant by "lability."

In May 2003, the company submitted a new report showing that children given Paxil were more likely to become suicidal than those given placebos. Also, the drug did not improve their depression any better than the placebo.

Dr. Mosholder asked for similar data from other drug companies. By last fall, he was looking at the results of 22 studies involving 4,250 children. His analysis of the combined results suggested that children given the drugs were 1.89 times more likely to become suicidal than those given placebos. He recommended that the agency ban doctors from prescribing all but Prozac to children, the only pill that had proven beneficial against childhood depression.

His bosses, however, suppressed his report and hired researchers at Columbia to re-analyze the underlying data that Dr. Mosholder had used, saying that some events labeled by drug-company researchers as suicidal did not seem worrisome.

Though the original studies had identified just 108 suicidal-related adverse events, the Columbia researchers expanded their inquiry to include about 400 adverse events, many of which had been originally labeled as "accidental."

The risk of a suicidal event among those given antidepressants in the trials was 1.78, only slightly less than the risk Dr. Mosholder found.

A spokesman for the F.D.A. did not return phone messages. A spokesman for Wyeth said that Effexor is not approved for use in children. A spokeswoman for GlaxoSmithKline declined to comment.

Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, who has been pushing an investigation into the F.D.A.'s handling of the controversy, said through a spokeswoman that the new memo from Dr. Mosholder "underscores what my committee investigation is finding as far as the strength of Dr. Mosholder's original analysis about antidepressants and kids."


Download the Print Edition of The New York Times to Your PC.




RELATED ARTICLES
. National Briefing | Rockies: Colorado: Sentence For Father In Cold-Medicine Deaths  (August 11, 2004) 
. LETTER FROM WASHINGTON; World Bank Challenged: Are the Poor Really Helped?  (July 28, 2004)  $
. MEDICINE'S DATA GAP: When Labels Mislead; Results of Drug Trials Can Mystify Doctors Through Omission  (July 21, 2004)  $
. Clinical Trial Of Growth Drug Shows Promise  (June 17, 2004)  $
Find more results for Children and Youth and Drugs (Pharmaceuticals)

TOP SCIENCE ARTICLES
. Tubes, Pump and Fragile Hope Keep a Baby's Heart Beating
. U.S. Would Allow 720 Snowmobiles Daily at Yellowstone
. Antidepressant Study Seen to Back Expert
. Sir Godfrey Hounsfield, Who Helped Develop the CAT Scanner, Dies at 84
Go to Science

OUR ADVERTISERS
Broadband phone $19.95 a month 3 months FREE lingo.com

Get the best TV experience with 35+ channels of HD programs

Learn about the risks of high cholesterol